|
|||||
 |
The plan would transform the Portland Memorial Coliseum and adjacent areas into Portland’s Sustainable Action Sports Complex and Resort. With sustainability being a key focus of the project, the resort/hotel and other new buildings would target LEED Gold or better certification using innovative waste water strategies like the “Living Machine” and “Eco Roofs” to reach their sustainable design goals. They also plan on using Geothermal, Wind and Solar as sources of energy for the complex. In one hand the plan seems like a great idea. Re-invigorate an aging and underused sports complex with the fastest growing segment of the sporting industry…”Action Sports”. Young and old would be able to enjoy surfing, skateboarding, BMX biking, rock climbing, kayaking, and white water rafting year round regardless of weather conditions. Seems like a great thing right….I know a lot of people in Seattle would love to not have to drive hours to get a quick surf session in. On the contrary, many feel the complex would exploit the ideal of many of these sports by creating a pay-to-play scenario and somehow undermine the soul of these sports. The idea that action sports should be exclusive to the individuals that “work for it” or “put the time” in is a commonly voiced opinion, especially among area locals. I see a major contradiction with this soulful, local-ism attitude. These same individuals that are against building a highly accessible and Sustainable Action Sports Complex in Portland are the same individuals that don’t want their local surf spots, dirt jumping or skate areas revealed and overrun by the public at large. If you don’t want your local break to become crowded then you should be supporting a project like this. It encourages a revitalization of the area with a sustainably built, modern sporting complex, which will allow thousands of people to enjoy sports they may not have easy access to…and it will keep them out of your lineup. You can contact the Rose Quarter Development Project directly with your public comment. I am sure this will be a heated debate. I would love to hear readers opinions on the proposed plan…
The Green Professionals Conference provides job-seekers, Green Professionals and industry experts with vital networking, educational resources and employment opportunities. The purpose of the Green Professionals Conference is to bring together people and organizations that are committed to an economically and environmentally sustainable future. This event seeks to drive innovation and progress by providing talented individuals with the knowledge and networking they need to succeed within the industry. A complete agenda can be found here. Conference session topics include:
Sounds like a great opportunity to find a job with focus on sustainability! If anyone makes it to the conference let me know how it is?
The TDR program is designed to promote responsible growth, while conserving areas like prime agriculture, forest, and environmentally sensitive lands. This allows growth to be steered into city centers, rather than limit or stop development. The end result is a direct link between economic redevelopment in cities and land preservation in sensitive rural areas. An example is the most recent TDR exchange in Seattle between Denny Triangle developers and sensitive rural landowners of the Cedar and Tolt watersheds. Three landowners on the Cedar and Tolt rivers sold their development rights to the developers of the Olive 8, Aspira and 2201 Westlake projects located in the Denny Triangle. This allowed the farm owners to receive compensation for their development rights and preserve the farm land with a conservation easement at the same time. The developers that purchased the development rights were able to use the TDR credits to increase the density of their projects beyond the zoning based densities for that area. The current market rate for one rural TDR credit that is equal to 2 additional urban units is $26,000. The TDR marketplace is somewhere around $4.9 million and growing. This marketplace is like any other commodity market driven by supply and demand. You can see the current TDR credits for sale on the TDR exchange. This program is active in many cities in King County including Seattle, Bellevue, Redmond and even smaller cities like Maple Valley. The Cascade Agenda and the King County TDR department are working to preserve as much rural area as possible in King County. To date over 144,000 acres of rural lands with farm, forest, open space, or regional trail amenities have been protected. The TDR program has been on hold recently in Seattle due to the former Mayor Nickels lack of interest in extending the agreement that ended in 2009. There is renewed hope that the agreement will be extended by the new Mayor Mike McGinn and the Seattle City Council. A drafted proposal awaits the extension. The proposal is to transfer development rights to the South Lake Union and Northgate urban centers from King County farms that supply local food to farmers markets, retailers and restaurants. There are 59 identified King County farms that match that criteria, currently 48 of these farms are not protected. From what I was able to absorb at this brown bag it seems obvious that we should be encouraging the new Mayor Mike McGinn and the Seattle City Council to renew the Transfer of Development Rights agreement in Seattle. This will allow the continued preservation of areas like our local farms and encourage growth to be directed at urban centers rather than rural sprawl.
Lumana Credit, a Seattle based microcredit organization is calling it a “Gift That Works”. Through the whole month of December they are asking you to give a gift on behalf of someone special in your life that will have an impact that extends far beyond the holiday season. Your gift will quickly be put to work helping female entrepreneurs in rural Ghana. Lumana’s mission is to empower these women with micro loans and business education classes so that they can work to lift themselves out of poverty. These micro loans will build stronger communities in the rural world through empowering under served populations with the necessary tools for successful entrepreneurship. Most gifts end up in landfills. This year, give a gift that empowers a woman to start her own business and invest in the lives of her children and community. Lumana Credit provides loans and education for rural villagers in Ghana with an impact that extends beyond the holiday season. Be a part of a movement to help lift people out of poverty through microcredit. These loans are making sustainable development in struggling communities a reality. Choose a gift that can fulfill dreams. Check out their website to see how you can get involved and give a meaningful gift this holiday. www.lumana.org  I stumbled across this today just in time for the Thanksgiving Black Friday shopping bonanza. So before you run out to hit the sales and do your holiday shopping read the story below about The 3/50 Project and how you can help to save your local brick and mortar stores that this country is built on.The 3/50 Project promotes stronger local economies through support of independent retailers and the consumers who shop with them.
The premise is simple…frequent three independently owned brick and mortar businesses that you would miss if they disappeared. Stop in say hello and spend$50 a month on something they provide that you enjoy. The local purchases that you make are the lively hood of these small businesses.
If half the employed population spent just $50 dollars each month in locally owned independent businesses, it would generate more than $42 billion in revenue. This would in turn create jobs and bolster the health of the local community you are spending these dollars in. It’s all about funneling revenue back into local business.
So while you are spreading your holiday cheer and shopping for gifts, food, etc…stop and think about where those gifts are coming from and if there is a local option. You can register with The 3/50 Project here to show our support. There is also a great blog that the founder of The 3/50 Project moderates called AlwaysUpward that has updated info on the project.
Think local…eat local…buy local.
These unsolicited commercial mailings…or more commonly referred to as ‘junk mail’ choke individual residents mail boxes to the tune of 41 pounds a year. The majority of this junk mail, 41% ends up in the landfill unopened. The production, distribution and disposal of junk mail produces 51 million tons of greenhouse gasses annually…equivalent to 10 million automobiles. The amount of paper required to produce the 105 billion pieces of junk mail distributed in the United States alone requires the annual harvest of approximately 100 million trees. If these trees were left standing they would act as carbon storehouses helping to reduce the effects of global warming. A Do Not Mail Registry would allow the City of Seattle to reduce burdens on its waste management and recycling programs allowing them to operate more efficiently. This will help the city reach its goals of landfill diversion and zero waste. As expected the Seattle City Council unanimously approved a resolution to urge Washington State Legislature to establish a Do Not Mail Registry. Im not exactly sure what urging will entail? I just hope it gets done soon. In a 2007 poll, 89% of likely voters nationwide supported a Do Not Mail Registry. Its obvious people want the option to opt out, so give it to us. Hopefully we wont see outside influence and lobbying throw a wrench in this resolution like we saw with the bag fee in Seattle recently. Encourage your local and state officials to create similar resolutions and push for the creation of a Do Not Mail Registry. You can sign the Do Not Mail petition here.
In this mailer Credo Mobile claims they are “a different kind of phone company. Unlike our competitors, we don’t claim to care about the environment and then give money to anti-green politicians. We don’t give to any politicians. And we fight for the progressive causes you believe in, like environmental protection, peace, reproductive rights and equality.” I read this and immediately thought…wow…righteous cell phone company. Talk about tooting your own horn! But from the sounds of it they actually are America’s greenest cell phone company. Since 1985 Credo has donated over $60 million to nonprofits, including groups working to fight global warming and safeguard the planet, like Greenpeace and Rainforest Action Network. They claim their members have shut down 63 coal fired power plants, helped push Congress to pass the fuel economy increase, offset the embodied energy required to produce every phone, plant 100 trees for every ton of paper used and print their junk mail and bills on 100% recycled paper with soy-based inks. It is likely that Credo could contribute far less and still be considered greener than the likes of At&t and Verizon. At&t is one of the largest contributors in American politics today with over $43 million in contributions since 1989 which has helped elect a number of right-wing, anti-environmental politicians. These politicians like Oklahoma senators James Inhofe and Tom Coburn, who both deny that global warming exists and voted against a major wilderness preservation bill this year. Then you have Verizon’s support to Rep. Ander Crenshaw (R-Fla), whose support of offshore drilling and the dismantling of wilderness protections has earned him consistent low marks from the League of Conservation Voters and their environmental scorecard. Credo also donates a portion of your cell phone bill to progressive nonprofit groups that you help chose. They have also managed to build and operate a highly effective citizen lobbying and community organizing network. This network allows alerts and updates to be targeted to the exact group that can and will make an impact. Credo has recognized that cell phones are an amazingly powerful medium to organize and share information that will help protect the planet. Continue reading “Credo Mobile - The Green Cell Phone Company?” »
The one candidate who clearly stands to be hurt by these two recent developments is Mike McGinn. He has run much of his campaign opposing the tunnel all together and recently conceding to the power of the unanimous city council vote to support the tunnel by saying he would not fight the city councils vote….but would fight against the Seattle residents being on the hook for the cost overruns. Overruns that will without a doubt be substantial. A recent study by the Sightline Institute sighted other recent Seattle tunnel projects like the downtown bus tunnel that was 56% over budget. There is no evidence based on past projects that the tunnel would come in on budget or on time for that matter. Unlike his opponent McGinn has a position and is against having the tax payers of Seattle pay for tunnel overruns. To McGinn’s credit he actually has a position on issues and policy where Mallahan seems to be agnostic. McGinn has also been constantly available for press comment acting as his own spokesperson. He has held numerous town halls listening to the public needs and concerns, while his opponent has declined invitation and abstained from attending. These recent events would appear to be an attempt to derail McGinn’s grassroots, low-budget, power to the people campaign. The candidate that stands to gain from these recent developments is Joe Mallahan. In his mayoral bid Mallahan has used his experience as a T-Mobile executive to somehow try to justify himself as the most qualified candidate to run the progressive city of Seattle. If you haven’t seen the last debate on King 5 you really owe it to yourself and the city of Seattle to watch it before you cast your vote. Lets just say Joe is not an eloquent speaker Continue reading “Seattle Election - The Smoke, Mirrors and Influence” »
As a citizen of the “Emerald City” I have witnessed first hand the increasingly aggressive and successful lobbying by local and even out of state companies that have profits not sustainability in mind. A perfect example is the failure of Seattle to implement the plastic bag fee. The Seattle city council agreed almost unanimously to approve the plastic bag fee. This city council initiative was immediately attacked by The American Chemistry Council. They pumped over $750,ooo into radio, TV and billboard adds designed to attack the bag fee initiative portraying it as a “bag tax”. They were able to collect the necessary number of signatures opposing the bag fee requiring it to be a ballot measure in the 2009 primary where the bag fee initiative was easily defeated. With Seattle’s green vote disappointingly absent the bag fee didn’t even make it to the Nov election ballot. It is absolutely absurd that someone like Tim Eyman can get initiative after ridiculous initiative like 1033 on the ballot but Seattle can’t pass a bag fee to encourage citizens to do a small part to reduce the impact of toxic plastic bags in our environment. This is a troubling and increasingly common example of influence from an interest group outside Seattle dictating policy to benefit big business while ignoring environmental and social well being of the community in question. The use of plastic bags has become a habit and convenience in our society. Pre 1970’s their were no plastic grocery bags and people got by just fine. The idea that we can keep living our lives without reducing our impact shows how ignorant and lazy our society is…even in Seattle. Seattle has an opportunity this November to elect a new mayor and several new council members. Some of these candidates have very strong and visionary sustainability goals for the city like Mike McGinn, Dow Constantine, Mike O’Brien, Nick Licata, etc. Then there are others that are obviously being funded, fueled and directed by big business like Joe Mallahan’s campaign for mayor and Susan Hutchison for King County Executive. If we do not elect progressive candidates in November, Seattle will take several giants steps backwards towards being a shining example of how sustainable policies in a major metropolitan city work. Seattle needs a mayor and a city council that is willing to make responsible investments in Seattle’s future that make Seattle an example that other cities look up to. If we don’t cities like Portland, OR and Vancouver B.C. will happily take the opportunity to be the leaders, innovators and authority in the sustainability movement on the west coast…the country…and the world.
Visitors are encouraged to start in various neighborhoods including Queen Anne-Magnolia, North Seattle, Shoreline, South Seattle, and West Seattle. Visitors can print a tour map, and begin their self-guided Solar Tour from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. A number of public demonstration projects, funded by Seattle City Light’s Green Power program, are included and are “drive-by” only. These projects include the Ballard Library, Meridian Park Elementary School, the Seattle Aquarium and many other notable sites. There will be three tour kick off locations at the Bertschi School Capitol Hill, Ballard Library and the Shoreline Community College. This is a great opportunity to see solar at work in your community. I will be at one of the stops on the tour most the day. Come say hello at Rick and Denese Preston’s home in Upper Rainer Beach. They will be showcasing a solar pre-heat hot water system in an array containing 30 Thermomax Mazdon evacuation tubes. |
||||
|
Copyright © 2010 TheGreenNW - All Rights Reserved |
|||||
The same group that puts on the 
The 2010 
Today I stopped in to a
Keeping with the trend of the last post I wanted to mention a local non-profit with a different spin on gift giving this holiday. The idea is to stop the waste that goes into normal gifts and instead get your loved ones a meaningful present, something they can be proud of.
Today I stopped in and listened to the 
I recently got some junk mail…not so green…from 
Seattle voters have already received their ballots for the all mail in ballot election this November 3rd. Most voters first saw these ballots several weeks ago. Since that time their has been an 
Seattle claims to be and frankly has been one of the 
This Saturday Oct 3rd 10am - 4pm is the 
Recent Comments